<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Facebook vs. Google Plus</title> <atom:link href="http://webhostinggeeks.com/blog/2011/11/30/facebook-googleplus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://webhostinggeeks.com/blog/2011/11/30/facebook-googleplus/</link> <description>Web Hosting Industry News, Latest Trends, and Analyses.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:15:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Investor</title><link>http://webhostinggeeks.com/blog/2011/11/30/facebook-googleplus/comment-page-1/#comment-32029</link> <dc:creator>Investor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:03:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://webhostinggeeks.com/blog/?p=3250#comment-32029</guid> <description>There is an opinion squarely in the side of Google: http://www.istockresearch.com/story/facebook-vs-google-2011-12-14
I think it has a lot of merit.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an opinion squarely in the side of Google: <a
href="http://www.istockresearch.com/story/facebook-vs-google-2011-12-14" rel="nofollow">http://www.istockresearch.com/story/facebook-vs-google-2011-12-14</a><br
/> I think it has a lot of merit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: webhostinggeeks.com @ 2012-02-23 03:25:28 -->
